Strevents counterexample

  • Josh Goh


bla bla bla


Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D. (1975). Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Neccessity, Vol. I. Princeton University Press.

Baumgartner, M. (2010). Informal reasoning and logical formalization. In Conrad, S. and Imhof, S., editors, Ding und Begriff. Ontos.

Baumgartner, M. and Lampert, T. (2008). Adequate formalization. Synthese, 164(1):93–115. Beall, J. and Restall, G. (2006). Logical Pluralism. Oxford University Press.

Beall, Jc, R. G. and Sagi, G. (2019). Logical consequence. In Zalta, E. N., editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, spring 2019 edition.

Betz, G. (2010). Theorie Dialektischer Strukturen. Klostermann.

Betz, G. (2012). Debate Dynamics: How Controversy Improves Our Beliefs. Springer.

Blau, U. (1977). Die dreiwertige Logik der Sprache: ihre Syntax, Semantik und Anwendung in der Sprachanalyse. Walter de Gruyter.

Bonnay, D. (2006). Logicality and invariance. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 14(1):29–68.

Bonnay, D. (2014). Logical constants, or how to use invariance in order to complete the explication of logical consequence. Philosophy Compass, 9:54– 65.

Brandom, R. B. (1994). Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.

Brun, G. (2004). Die Richtige Formel. Philosophische Probleme der Logischen Formalisierung. Ontos.

Brun, G. (2012). Adequate formalization and de morgan’s argument. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 85(1):325–335.